On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:08 Larry Garfield wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2025, at 5:55 PM, Ilija Tovilo wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:58 AM Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I hereby open the vote on the Pipe operator RFC: >>> >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pipe-operator-v3 >> >> It looks like the example under "Rejected Features" is wrong. >> >> // With Elixir style >> $foo >> |> bar(...) >> >> should be >> >> $foo >> |> bar() >> >> Also a nit: The RFC says "There was discussion off-list of >> “auto-partialling” functions after a pipe", but this idea was since >> discussed on-list as well. >> >> Ilija > > Hm, good catch. Normally you're not supposed to edit an RFC in voting, > but as this is a typo fix in a Rejected Features section (ie, it has > zero impact on the thing being voted on), I think it's probably OK to fix. > > I'll give a day or so for someone to object that it still shouldn't be > allowed, > and if no one does then I'll make those edits. > > --Larry Garfield
I think it's fine to fix typos, misspellings, and grammar mistakes which don't affect what's being voted on. While you're at it, please also fix the `match()` example, which should not contain `case` keywords. Theodore
