I forgot to mention that on the flip side, this would allow `public public(set) readonly` properties to be "overwritten" after __clone touched them; which is why we chose the more "locked down" version in the first place. So I want to consider this before just updating the RFC :)
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Larry Garfield
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Volker Dusch
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Dmitry Derepko
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Tim Düsterhus
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Larry Garfield
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Tim Düsterhus
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Larry Garfield
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Nicolas Grekas
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone wi... Volker Dusch
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clon... Volker Dusch
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Volker Dusch
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Stephen Reay
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Andreas Hennings
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone with v2 Stephen Reay
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone wi... Rob Landers
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clon... Tim Düsterhus
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clon... Rob Landers
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clon... Larry Garfield
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clon... Rob Landers
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Clone wi... Andreas Hennings