Hi On 11/23/25 15:29, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
The implementation should be up to date with the latest changes.
The implementation was up to date, but one example in the RFC accidentally had an outdated error message (I've been made aware off-list).
I've fixed the error message and also noted that the error messages are not final and not part of the actual RFC to allow some flexibility to enable the best possible error messages as part of the final review of the implementation.
Best regards Tim Düsterhus
