On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:30:23 -0500 "John Coggeshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't done a comparison, but imagecopyrotated() isn't something I > made -- I ported it from the latest version of the GD library. If you > think you could make a better imagecopyrotated() I don't have a > problem with it, but I don't really see a great deal of need. Neither I do :) I thought it was cleaner to use the current gdImageRotate function instead of reimplement a brute force rotation function. I was afraid of bogus report like "Why copyrotate does not provide the same result as rotate?" ;-) But from my point of view, I do not care about the current GD itself, I will continue my job on php5 gd later in april, that makes more sense to us, as we discussed it sometimes ago. hth pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
