On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 15:41, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > BTW, I don't exactly think dmalloc is the best way for what we are going > to do, since AFAIK it's general-purpose allocator, and what we need is > more to the direction of fixed-size block allocator.
Fixed-size? Do you mean an allocator that is optimized for allocation of blocks of a certain size, or an allocator that can only allocate blocks of a certain size? I have only written a couple of allocators, and the best one I did used fixed block sizes, such as 16 bytes, 32 bytes, 64 bytes and so on... I suppose that's the way dlmalloc works as well, and that's the problem. -- Best regards, Per Lundberg / Capio ApS Phone: +46-18-4186040 Fax: +46-18-4186049 Web: http://www.nobolt.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
