From: Steph
> well.. would it kill anyone to have iconv built-in anyway? I mean by
> default built-in? At present that's done purely for libxml but Frank's
> right, gtk+ also has it as a dependency. Are these the only two areas
that
> rely on iconv at all?
As far as I could tell yes those are the only areas, note that under libxml
you are including:
xml, simplexml, dom, xsl, wddx, soap, xmlrpc (and xmlreader/writer in
pecl)
The only way for it to work is either with Wez's dependancy patch or if done
in 5.0 branch the iconv lib would have to statically be built into php5ts
and exported wether or not the iconv ext was built statically or shared.
I do think it would be a good idea to be able to build iconv without having
libxml support though.
Rob
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
