> On Mar 10, 2020, at 7:53 AM, Aleksander Machniak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10.03.2020 12:43, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>>>> Alternately, why not use this (which is probably the best option IMO)?:
>>>>
>>>> function foo() attributes
>>>> SingleArgument("Hello"),
>>>> Another\SingleArgument("World"),
>>>> \My\Attributes\FewArguments("foo", "bar") {}
>>>>
>>>
>>> This particular example leads to complications with how different keywords
>>> stack up; would the return statement come before the "attributes" keyword?
>>
>> How does the return statement affect this example? The return statement
>> would be inside the braces, the attributes would be before the braces.
>
> I think he meant return type declaration. That's why the question about
> the `use` clause is as well relevant.
If that is the case that makes a little more sense.
But even so, the question is surprising because we have a well established
existing pattern with extends and implements clauses, for example:
function foo():returntype
extends Parent
implements Interface1, Interface2, Interface2
attributes Attribute1, Attribute2, Attribute3 {}
-Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
