On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:09 PM Jakob Givoni <ja...@givoni.dk> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mike Schinkel <m...@newclarity.net> wrote: > > If we had that we could list the reasons and the number of votes that > choose those reasons on the RFC for historical purposes. > > Thanks Mike, exactly what I was thinking when I started writing RFC: > COPA (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment)! > > As you can see in my "Voting" section, I had the idea to capture > reasons for no-votes, to document it in the outcome of the RFC, should > it fail. > It would have saved my research quite a bit if I had had the no-vote > reasons for the RFCs I reference at the bottom. > > +1 on the idea from me! > FWIW this has been discussed a few times already, and I believe the consensus is: We're happy to have *optional* reasons for votes, if someone actually implements it. For the number of times someone has brought this up on list, there has been a distinct lack of volunteers for actually making it happen ;) Nikita
