On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 10:15, Rowan Tommins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not a fan of the @@ syntax, and respect what you're trying to do with > this RFC, but am disappointed you haven't engaged with those of us who said > that the RFC needs more detail. There is simply not enough information in > that table to "have an objective look", and the only other text in the RFC > makes a vague assertion about the lack of ending symbol which I still don't > understand the significance of. > I have voted no because I asked a question about the ending delimiter and why () didn't count. Another person asked a similar question and neither of us got a reply. Peter
