On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:25 AM Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> wrote: > > 1. October: RMs and/or php-web maintainers should give their go on the idea > (someone else?), so that more detailed creative time investment is not > going to waste.
FTR they came to Gabriel and I *first*. Sounded like a neat idea to both of us, but I explicitly deferred them to internals@lists.php.net* as that's not up to whoever happens to be RM for that release. It's something for all of us to agree (or disagree) on. On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:32 AM Kalle Sommer Nielsen <ka...@php.net> wrote: > Also note that anything related to the websites belong to the > php-webmaster@ mailing list, *not* internals and I would highly > recommend moving the thread there. > I sent them here rather than php-webmaster@ because that list is noisier than a Rhino in a wind chime factory. You might well have been the only person to notice it had it gone there. On the rest of your response, I agree. PHP has long held neutrality and there's no good reason to start playing favorites now. That said, I think it might be reasonable to invite *any* (or perhaps, "any with at least X many Ys" -- criteria TBD) framework/app/project to provide their own stats (relative changes only, no claims on absolute "speed" relative to each other). We already allow conferences to submit NEWS items that go on the front page. Inviting claims (with disclaimers?) from PHP adjacent projects isn't a massive leap from there. As for the "community leaders" section... I hadn't even noticed that on first review. The name of that is even a little gross and presumptive. I'd probably just toss that one out. With projects, we can at the very least put a requirement that it must be FOSS. That doesn't work in this section nearly so well. -Sara
