i'm just piping up that i'm a strong +1 on goto, its immensely useful
for code generators, like for example a gui application that wanted to
generate some type of php code.
also, when you start quoting djikstra in a php context, you've lost.
goto is fine, fight the power!
-sterling
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:44:07 -0700, Sara Golemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does the GOTO implementation handle this
> > script1.php
> > <?php
> >
> > do_some_stuff();
> > include script2.php;
> >
> > label:
> > echo "Hello"
> > ?>
> >
> > script2.php:
> > <?php
> > declare_some_funcs();
> > .... some code ...
> > if (some_cond) {
> > goto label;
> > }
> > .... other code....
> > ?>
> >
> Included files are actually separate execution scopes (even though they're
> shared data scope). So the implementation referenced originally would raise
> an error saing that 'label' is an undefined label.
>
> -Sara
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
..I....I..
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
