Hi internals.
RFC has been updated to 1.3 and implemented.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object_scope_prng
The main changes are as follows:
- `RNG\OSRNG` has been renamed to `RNG\OS`. This was too verbose.
- `rng_rand()` has been renamed to `rng_int()` and the arguments `$min`
and `$max` are now required.
- `RNG\RNG64Interface` has been removed and `next64()` is now included in
`RNGInterface`.
- PHP code does not depend on the size of int. Even if it contains a
64-bit implementation, it will work fine on 32-bit PHP. Libraries should
always consider the 64-bit environment.
- To solve various problems, the `rng_next()` and `rng_next64()`
functions have been added.
- `rng_next64()` throws a `ValueError` exception when called in a 32bit
environment.
The current phpstub is as follows:
```php
function shuffle(array &$array, ?RNG\RNGInterface $rng = null): bool {}
function str_shuffle(string $string, ?RNG\RNGInterface $rng = null): string
{}
function array_rand(array $array, int $num = 1, ?RNG\RNGInterface $rng =
null): int|string|array {}
function rng_bytes(RNG\RNGInterface $rng, int $length): string {}
function rng_int(RNG\RNGInterface $rng, int $min, int $max): int {}
function rng_next(RNG\RNGInterface $rng, bool $unsigned = true): int {}
/** @throws ValueError */
function rng_next64(RNG\RNGInterface $rng, bool $unsigned = true): int {}
```
On the other hand, there are still the following problems
- If `next64()` method is called directly in a 32-bit environment, it will
produce unintended results.
- This can be avoided by using `rng_next64()` in RFC 1.3. As with the
various internal interfaces, direct method calls can be deprecated.
- Namespace. `RNG`, `PHP\RNG`... etc
- Interface naming. `RNGInterface` may be a bit redundant.
`NumberGenerator`, etc?
We are looking for feedback on these problems.
Regards,
Go Kudo
2021年1月9日(土) 19:00 Go Kudo <[email protected]>:
> Hi internals.
>
> I think I'm ready to discuss this RFC.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object_scope_prng
>
> Previous internals thread: https://externals.io/message/112525
>
> Now is the time to let me know what you think.
>
> Regards,
> Go Kudo
>