On Wed., Mar. 10, 2021, 11:22 Matthew Brown, <matthewmatt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If a significant number agree I can add a secondary vote on noreturn vs > never, but never introduces more of a BC risk. > Hi Matt, I like this RFC, but I'd like to see the RFC cover if any other languages have a similar return type. The definition of `void` is that it has no return value, so I too agree that the keyword `noreturn` is too close in meaning to `void`. I'd also like to throw the word `deadend` or something similar into the ring, to make things a bit clearer. Thanks, Peter
