Hi Larry, On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:55 PM Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> > They currently do, since they work by creating a Closure-esque object > called Partial with an __invoke() method. > > --Larry Garfield > > 1. Would it be possible to mention the `Partial` class in the RFC? From what I understand this is what it will be returned by the `get_class($partial)`. I guess the class will be final (similar with Closure) and will only have a private constructor and a public __invoke method. 2. As now ReflectionFunction accepts Closure|string, wouldn't it be simpler for the users to just have it accept Closure|Partial|string to avoid introducing another reflection class and also avoid the userland issue you mentioned? Alex
