Hah, I sure did not expect my answer to trigger these 5 complex RFCs worth of work ;)

On 03/06/2021 00:59, Mike Schinkel wrote:


4.) Given Nikita's comments on the O(<n>) performance of array_shift() have you 
considered instead simulating a FIFO queue using an array as a stack?  Any reason 
that would not work for your needs?

I think your analysis is overall on point. There are probably better data structures that could lead to me not needing array_shift in most places I use it. However arrays are quite the tool in PHP, and lazy as it may be they usually do the job well enough and the perf overhead of reindexing (which tbh I was not aware of until this thread) seems unnoticeable in most case (a quick test shows 1ms to shift a 300K item array on my loaded laptop, which is really quite acceptable).


So in summary the tangential topics I addressed were:

1.) PHP potentially supporting multiple return values, and
2.) Renewed focus on SPL data structures.

Again, if anyone is interested in these tangential topics and wants to discuss 
further, please create a new thread and quote my applicable comments from this 
email.
To your other points: Multiple return values and SPL with better docs/naming/usability would absolutely be great to have from my userland perspective.

Best,
Jordi

--
Jordi Boggiano
@seldaek - https://seld.be

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to