On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:21 AM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:21 PM Go Kudo <zeriyo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The voting phase for the following RFCs will begin as soon as two weeks
>> have passed.
>>
>> https://externals.io/message/115975
>>
>> I don't see any particular discussion, so I'm contacting you just in case.
>
>
> I'm pretty neutral on this proposal. I don't think there's a strong 
> motivation to move this functionality into a separate extension, but I also 
> don't see any particular problems with doing it (as long as it's an 
> always-required extension, which this is).
>
> I believe Levi is a proponent of splitting up ext/standard into smaller 
> extensions, maybe he has some thoughts on this.
>
> Regards,
> Nikita

I've glanced at the patch; it seems fine. I do like smaller, focused
extensions better than throwing things in `ext/standard`.

Can we change the return types of the functions in this extension
returning `SUCCESS`/`FAILURE` to `zend_result` at the same time? I
think it's just these two:

  - php_random_bytes
  - php_random_int

Actually, is that something we could still do for PHP 8.1?

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to