Andi wrote: > Oh boy, if you don't see the difference between "concrete > suggestions to be > heard that's fine, but try and keep it short, to the point, and > constructive"
There were concrete solutions (if you cared to read. so atleast read this one all the way) And were also backed up by others. So not everyone took offense at it....nor there shold be any need to. Why is it not concrete ? Andi wrote: > and the email you sent then it is really preferable to > everyone here for you to stop emailing this list. So let us know who is included and who is NOT in that convenient use of "everyone". We must drop arrognace and work towards encouraging discussions that can improve the situation moving forward. Only by encouraging discusssion can we reach to solutions to such issues. Once again I am *not* asking to hold a whip to the developers who are working for free here. Just dont include code until its ready. Let them mature elsewhere and carefully pick the best of the lot. Invite implementations for a given feature. So people know their work may have a good chance of going somehwere...if they did a good job. It encourages healthy competition and improves product quality. PHP has been bitten by this before many times, lets not let it happen again. And lets not advertise experimental features. -Roshan -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
