I do not have the luxury of designing my own system. I am forced to use upstream. I can't help it and given the history of private usage and the refusal on relaxing them I do not see this improving with the readonly. At all.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 2:42 PM Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote: > Terrible idea: reflection is mostly introspection tooling, and doesn't > really bend the rules of the type system, other than crossing scope (it > "sees" more). > > Please consider designing your system to consider the constraints of > `readonly` properties, or design the constraints to fit your system instead. > > Marco Pivetta > > https://twitter.com/Ocramius > > https://ocramius.github.io/ > > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 23:39, Karoly Negyesi <kar...@negyesi.net> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> If push comes to shove, private properties can be changed with reflection. >> >> Readonly properties can't. >> >> Please add a readonly toggle to reflection. >> >> Thanks >> >> Karoly Negyesi >> >
