> > Regarding $field vs. $this->propName, there's a few reasons we went that > route.
Overall I think this is a really good proposal, but you might want to consider a second vote for that particular syntax. `$field` vs `$this->propName` feels a little magical. It's a simpler magic than actual magic methods — it's magic that static analysis tools can quickly reason about (as they can with promoted properties). But I can imagine developers coming across this particular syntax in a PR and thinking "that looks like a bug". I know it's a few extra keypresses, but I think $this->propName is easier to scan, and more familiar (given this RFC introduces a lot of other new syntax).
