On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Zeev Suraski wrote: > That's true, I did kind of forget about the other OS's out there, it's very > easy to get used to the efficiency of Linux... > It would be interesting to see how far the realpath cache can get you with > this app. Can you share that standard benchmark of yours?
We have "instructed" a customer to test it (running freebsd) and he'll benchmark it, and also watch diskio and sustem load. When they report back I'll share it of course. > Yes, I would know that. But it breaks when it's most needed. In my > experience the circumstances where it won't work properly are extremely common. But for those people this patch isn't interesting anyway. It's only interesting if you have a dedicated server running. People can easily test their applications for this too. > I *think* you agree with that, and that we're best off putting it in a > special location, maybe on php.net (if you disagree and I'm putting words > in your mouth, my apologies and I take it back). Patches are still a hassle to maintain, especially if you're mixing two of them running it on the same code. THey also need updating often due to changes in the distribution. Thinks like that are annoying, although I don't see a better solution for this now (except by doing it the kernel way and use --enable-expirental-foo for example). Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
