On 10-7-2024 1:39, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
On Thursday, 4 July 2024 at 14:52, Gina P. Banyard <intern...@gpb.moe> wrote: Moreover, I know the traffic on the list has been pretty high, but I do intend to have this RFC up for voting for inclusion in PHP 8.4, and I'm not exactly sure how I am meant to interpret the lack of responses.
Gina, just as a heads-up: I really want to spend some time to study this RFC (and some others) in detail and am struggling to keep up (yes, the traffic has been pretty high over the last month or so).
If I'm honest, I'd say that posting a complex and long RFC like this with only a little more than a month left before feature freeze may be a little late in the cycle. I fear there is not enough time for detailed discussion and that it will either fail due to the lateness in the cycle or pass because people trust you, rather than based on the merit of the RFC.
As an aside - not directly related to this RFC - I'm noticing more and more RFCs which need correction or a follow-up RFC after the vote has taken place. In my perception, this was much rarer in previous cycles. I'm not going to hypothesize why this is, but it does make me wonder ...
Smile, Juliette
