On 20 August 2024 00:21:22 BST, Rob Landers <rob@bottled.codes> wrote:
>
>I assume you are worried about something like this passing test?
>
>--TEST--
>show called only once
>--FILE--
><?php
>
>namespace test;
>
>spl_autoload_register(function($name) {
> echo "name=$name\n";
>}, true, false, SPL_AUTOLOAD_FUNCTION);
>
>echo strlen('foo');
>echo strlen('bar');
>echo strlen('baz');
>?>
>--EXPECT--
>name=test\strlen
>333
>
>In my RFC, I mention it is called exactly once.
I haven't looked at the PR, only the RFC, and I did not see this very important
detail explained anywhere. The only thing I can see is this rather ambiguous
sentence:
> The function autoloader will not be called again.
That could mean not called again for the current call (compared with proposals
that call it a second time with the unequalled name); it could mean not called
again for the current line of code (based on the current caching behaviour); or
never called again for that combination of namespace and name; or possibly,
never called again for that combination of namespace, name, and callback
function.
That's not a small detail of the implementation, it's a really fundamental
difference from previous proposals.
So I would like to repeat my first response to your RFC: that it should sound
more time explaining your approach to the multiple lookup problem.
Regards,
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]
