On Aug 23 2024, at 3:41 pm, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] <imsop....@rwec.co.uk> wrote: > > None of these seem like showstoppers to me, but since we can so easily go one > step further to "global only", and avoid them, why wouldn't we?
FWIW I'd support global only, specifically because of the point I wouldn't necessarily want the change to hamstring our ability to add new functions in the future.
