On 25/08/2024 18:30, Bilge wrote:
I apologise for coming on strong, but I put a lot of effort into this,
so I take exception to the implication that anyone involved took the
easy way out to arrive at this (our best) solution.
I apologise for the inadvertent offence.
It was based solely on this comment from Ilija:
> I also believe some of the rules you've laid out would be hard to
enforce.
I took that to mean that supporting generic expressions was
straight-forward, but supporting a limited set would be complex in some
way. Apparently I was wrong in that interpretation; in which case, I've
no idea what that sentence was referring to.
--
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]
