On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, at 16:05, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > Am 2025-02-07 15:23, schrieb Rob Landers: > > Instantiation is done by static access: new Outer::Inner(1), which is > > currently a syntax error. > > How would I access static members on an inner class without having > ambiguity? `Outer::Inner::Const` already is valid syntax.
I can actually answer this one. The name of an inner class must not conflict with either a const or a method in the outer class because this is also currently valid syntax `new (Outer::Inner::Const)` where it resolves to a string of an existing class or `new (Outer::Inner::Method())` where it returns a string to an existing class. — Rob
