> > 2025年3月8日(土) 19:06 Niels Dossche <dossche.ni...@gmail.com>: > > > > On 08/03/2025 03:30, youkidearitai wrote: > > > Hi, Internals > > > > > > The add mb_levenshtein was end and declined. > > > Vote result is one yes and 5 no. > > > > > > Thank you very much voting. > > > > > > By the way, This message is means add grapheme_levenshtein instead of > > > mb_levenshtein? > > > Or nothing to do? > > > Feel free to comment. > > > > > > Thank you again. > > > Yuya. > > > > > > > Hi Yuya > > > > I think an RFC for grapheme_levenshtein would be better, it would have > my vote at least. > > Levenshtein makes more sense on graphemes than on unicode codepoints. > > > > Kind regards > > Niels > > Hi, Niels > > Thank you very much for reply. > Okay. I will go to grapheme_levenshtein RFC. > > Kind regards > Yuya > > On my side, I'm not sure this would make sense. There's a PHP implementation of the levenshtein algo: https://packagist.org/packages/oefenweb/damerau-levenshtein
This might be good enough. Better leave clustering (graphemes/etc) as a separate concern. Did you consider this option? Nicolas
