Hi

Am 2025-04-15 23:55, schrieb Máté Kocsis:
This was one of my (unspoken) ideas as well. I used to think there must
have been a correct logic
for percent-decoding of WHATWG components, but if none of us can come up
with a sensible
idea, then it's best not to try it, I agree.

Sweet. I believe this was/is the last remaining blocker for the RFC or is there still anyone else from your side that needs to be discussed? I need to give the RFC another read once you made the adjustment to remove the WhatWg raw methods (and adjusted the corresponding explanations), but I think I'm happy then :-)

-----

For the latest changes from Tuesday, I see that you added the WhatWg-specific `InvalidUrlException`. The `Uri\InvalidUriException` however still has the `$errors` property. I think you might have forgotten to remove it, since the Rfc3986 implementation / the base exception does not expose any errors, right?

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus

Reply via email to