On Sunday, 15 June 2025 at 19:32, Daniel Kesselberg <m...@danielkesselberg.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > Thanks for all your feedback on the RFC. > > I've updated the RFC to incorporate most of your feedback: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/num_available_processors > > 1) The limitation, that the CPU affinity mask is ignored This is something you need to decide on as the RFC author. > 2) The naming discussion I don't care much about this topic, but possibly adding the sys_ prefix makes the most sense to "soft namespace" the function. > 3) Function availability on unsupported platforms The function should not be available if it is unsupported, as this how every other conditionally supported feature is handled. > 4) Return type Arguably, this should always return an integer. Which if my understanding is correct, when you make it conditionally available then it cannot fail. > How do we continue? ;) I see there are various ideas how to approach it, > is that something you would vote (let's do a or b) on, or how does that > work? Small RFCs should only have a single yes/no vote. As the RFC author, you can (and should) be opinionated. Best regards, Gina P. Banyard PS: Minor list etiquette remainder, please do not top post, and only keep the relevant things while quoting.
