On 2 August 2025 20:12:59 BST, Rob Landers <rob@bottled.codes> wrote: >I mentioned in my first reply, there is no way to get an instance-level >property unshadowed. It is there though (according to inheritance.c, if I’m >reading it right, it is still accessible, just not from user-land).
I'd be interested to see what code you're looking at. As I showed in my last email, there's an explicit difference in how private and protected property names are mangled, and it's consistent with how reflection, serialisation, and debug functions output them - which is that there is only one property, no matter how many times in the inheritance chain it is redefined. Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
