Hi,

On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM Gina P. Banyard <intern...@gpb.moe> wrote:

> I don't mind splitting the PR into 2 different ones, one for __sleep()
> and the other one for __wakeup(), but once again people are complaining
> that a 2/3 threshold is seemingly not enough when it is not necessarily an
> easy threshold to pass.
>

The complaint wasn't that the 2/3 threshold is not enough. It was that the
RFC missed some important points and was in that sense misleading. The
result was just narrowly passing the threshold. So the point was that it's
quite likely it wouldn't pass it if the RFC description was correct.

Regards

Jakub

Reply via email to