On 01.09.2025 at 12:28, Nick wrote: > When I try to look into the discussions of older RFCs to find out why they > ended up the way they did, it’s not easy. You hardly can find them. This is > because they are often not referenced in the RFC itself. > > Going forward, would it make sense to make it mandatory to reference > '[Discussion]' and '[Vote]' in the RFC text itself?
Well, the RFC template has a "Reference" section which says: | Links to external references, discussions, or RFCs. In my opinion, that is a perfect place to add these links. Of course, someone needs to actually add this information. Christoph
