> I guess my main thing is that this RFC should only cover coroutine machinery: > it should not promise "transparent async" or "code
It’s like trying to dig a hole with half a shovel :) > that works exactly the same" OR if it wants to make those claims, it should > actually demonstrate > how instead of hand-waving everything as an "implementation detail" when none > of those claims can actually be validated without those details. All of my claims are backed by tests :)
