вс, 18 янв. 2026 г. в 14:08, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]>:
> Hi Mikhail, > > On 1/18/26 08:31, Mikhail Savin wrote: > > This starts the voting phase for the RFC “Add BackedEnum::values()”. > > The start of the vote is very surprising to me. I did not feel that a 12 > email-discussion was sufficient to properly evaluate a long-term plan > that stretches until PHP 9.0. > > It is also in violation of the policy, which requires the discussion to > be recent (the last email in the discussion thread is from 53 days ago, > which requires a 7 day cooldown after a restart of the discussion) and > also an last call “Intent to Vote” announcement (at least 2 days before > the vote) to make sure that the RFC is fresh in the minds of the voters: > > > https://github.com/php/policies/blob/main/feature-proposals.rst#discussion-phase > > I'm also noticing that you made a number of significant changes > (including increasing the version number) to the RFC text just today > which folks did not yet have the chance to review and discuss before the > vote: > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_values_method_to_backed_enum?do=diff&rev2%5B0%5D=1763285697&rev2%5B1%5D=1768720119&difftype=sidebyside > > … all while there still are “Open Issues” listed in the RFC. These > should be resolved before the vote. > > I therefore request the vote to be canceled for now and discussion > restarted based on the updated version 1.2 of the RFC. > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus > Hi, Tim Thanks for the detailed feedback I'll close voting and continue discussion thread then
