On 21.01.26 16:33, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi Am 2026-01-21 16:17, schrieb Andreas Heigl:As RFC7231 explicitly requests GMT I'd even reject formatting a DateTime-object that has been set to UTC.Quoting from RFC 9110#5.6.7:An HTTP-date value represents time as an instance of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
In all fairness: It is really hard for me to take someone serious that is posting this:
And I am also quoting from RFC 9110#5.6.7"The first two formats indicate UTC by the three-letter abbreviation for Greenwich Mean Time, "GMT", a predecessor of the UTC name;"
That is about the same as saying "Prices are indicated in Euro by the three-letter abbreviation for US-Dollar, 'USD', a predecessessor of the EUR name"
Anyhow! This is a technicallity that in most cases is irrelevant and does not invalidate the rest of the message
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:[email protected] N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| GPG-Key: https://hei.gl/keyandreasheiglorg |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
