On Thu, Mar 12, 2026, at 10:53 AM, Calvin Buckley wrote: > On Mar 11, 2026, at 3:35 PM, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 3. >> >> For the voting options: You need to define a tie-breaker for the secondary >> votes. > > I might be a little dense here; I see tie-breakers mentioned in > feature-proposals, but I don't see any guidance on how to include them > in an RFC. The other RFCs I've been skimming don't seem to mention them > either. Just put something like "in case of a tie, the default will be 1" above that voting widget. (Or 0 if you want to go that way.) Same for the other one. Few RFCs have secondary votes, so you won't see it very often. And they don't always mention a tie breaker, even though they arguably should. --Larry Garfield
