Hi, On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:21 AM Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > thanks for your work on this, really good. > > sadly i voted no for the reason i explained, and pushing it as many may > vote for the very good improvements and "ignore" the fundamental design > flaw for the new addition, so I think it will surely pass, but that's kind > of bad. And as you did not add two votes... > > As I told you many times, the things that you mentioned can be easily added later without any BC impact - they are not flows but just extra features that you think should be there. I didn't ignore it, I just don't think what you proposes is worth adding. Kind regards Jakub
