Hi,

It's been more than 14 days since the last major change to this RFC so I
plan to start the voting phase next Monday

Cheers

Carlos

On Sat, 2 May 2026 at 09:28, Barel <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 at 09:34, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 2026-04-25 21:37, schrieb Barel:
>> > Many thanks for your comments regarding the RFC, I have updated it.
>>
>> I'm seeing you adjusted the text to mention “If any segment is not a
>> string or integer: throw a TypeError, even if that segment would not be
>> reached”. This is however not reflected in the example implementation.
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. This has been updated in the RFC
>
> Carlos
>

Reply via email to