> The migration is intended to be a lift-and-shift: documentation pages are moved one-to-one to the new location without content changes, restructuring, or rewrites.
> Only the English (canonical) documentation is migrated. > ... > Carrying translations over would require coordinating handoff with each translation team for each extension, and would re-introduce the coupling this RFC seeks to remove. I don't understand what the problem with translations. What is so special about english that it can be lift-and-shifted, but other languages cannot? What specific coordination is required from the translation team?
