Hello Jorg, On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, at 00:37, Jorg Sowa wrote: > “did you mean …?” suggestions to errors for undefined functions. While it > does not change language semantics, it changes error messages and introduces > additional checks on error paths, so I would like to confirm whether > consensus on the PR is sufficient or an RFC is expected. >
Thanks, this is great. According to PHP Policy RFC: Exempt input type and value validation from BC Break policy <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/policy-exempt-type-value-error-bc-policy>, rephrasing error messages is not subject to the backwards compatibility break policy. I think the amount of punctuation at the end is a bit much. Perhaps it would be clearer (although less strictly correct) to say "(did you mean func?)" instead of "(did you mean func()?)". But either way I am in favor of this. Regards, Sjoerd Langkemper
