Hello Andi,

Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:16 PM, you wrote:

> At 01:33 PM 2/11/2005 -0500, Sean Coates wrote:
>>Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>>I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into 
>>>the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex 
>>>signatures and this kind of syntax won't be sufficient anyway.
>>>We will need to have a way to document web services so that we can 
>>>auto-generate WSDL files.
>>
>>It would be nice to be able to (optionally) parse phpdoc comments with the
>>reflection API (not only return the docComment, but also parse it into 
>>appropriate pieces), if this is going to be the "official" way to do this.
>>
>>Note: I'm not making any demands... just an idea/request.

> Yes, that could be nice. Maybe someone will write an ext/docComment. 
> Shouldn't be too hard.

We'd need a new engine function pointer, one that allows to interpret every
docComment grabbed from the script :-)


-- 
Best regards,
 Marcus                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to