Guys,
I definitely think that the path to 5.1 currently has to focus on PDO and
the ZE stabilizing. I plan to release Beta 3 hopefully tomorrow (a bit late
because I'm still waiting for some PDO fixes Wez wants to make). Commiting
a new Date extension at this point is definitely high risk. Derick probably
wouldn't agree if it were someone else :)
I personally would prefer this work to be done in PECL and roll them into
HEAD once they have stabilized. As it's new functionality it could also be
in a mini release (5.1.1, 5.1.2) which will surely follow quickly after
5.1.0. I don't see why we need to be in such a rush... There is no reason
this won't get out to the masses. As it is, it was questionable wether my
call to allow changing the core Date functions at such a late time in the
game was a good call by me.
Andi
At 12:27 AM 7/12/2005 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:16:45 -0700
> > Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Can we please wrap up the whole OO/non-OO discussion and just fix
> > > the damn ext/date so that it works as advertised? The rest can be
> > > done later. Let's not hold up RC1 unless really necessary.
> >
> > It's not a stopping for 5.1. This is not going to be in 5.1. We
> > already agreed on that :)
>
> We did not. I implemented my specs now, including OO methods. Updated
> ones are attached.
Patch is here:
http://files.derickrethans.nl/patches/date-2005-07-12.diff.txt
Also fixes a bug parsing 11Oct and adds some constants with commonly
used formats.
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
