Guys,

Regarding Derick's commit, it's a very technical matter. It's commented and not enabled. Now new features crept in and after reviewing the patch, I felt that it's not dangerous nor complicated to let it sit in CVS commented. As you can see it's very isolated code so there's still room for change & discussion. Now to a more important issue than technicality of where code sits:

I'll say it again. You should really work as a team and come with the best solution that will benefit the PHP community! Development is typically a 1+1=3 equation. The end result of a small team is better than that of an individual.

Guys, work [EMAIL PROTECTED] You'll get the best results and ultimately our goal is to provide the best solutions to PHP users, not spend time in politics and on ego trips.

I'm not going to play policeman (and I shouldn't). You guys really have to work it out together...

Andi

At 11:13 AM 7/20/2005 +0200, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:40:20 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edin Kadribasic) wrote:

> Derick,
>
> Didn't we agree not to do this until 5.1 was released? Please
> revert the object support.

Derick told me on IRC that he agreed on that with Andi.

I still think that we should not expose the new lib now. It is far
too early.

I said that I will post the specs 10 days ago, sorry about that,
got other problems to solve (various php4.4 problems like
segfaults and some more urgent sec fixes in various packages...).

But the fact that we agreed to do not expose it using new APIs
before 5.1 branched and back to real -dev is still valid.

Again, please revert.

--Pierre

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to