Hello Pierre,

Saturday, October 1, 2005, 5:04:01 PM, you wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:48:47 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:

>> Hello Pierre,
>> 
>> Saturday, October 1, 2005, 4:24:02 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>> > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> >> 1. not modify any error reporting setting 
>> 
>> > We have to modify it as the underlying code is not php5 _only_ but
>> > have to work for both php5 and php4.
>> 
>> >> 2. PHP 5.1 compatible code.
>> 
>> > It is compatible, or do you mean E_STRICK compatible?
>> 
>> You should face reality that php 5 is a bit different than php 4.

> I do know that, I did explain my opinions about having PEAR bundled by
> default in 5.1+ and so on. But other php developers seem to fully
> disagree with me on this topic, as many PEAR developers, nothing more I
> can do.

>> Many of the things changed in php 5 were made to support exactly pear
>> development but pear is absolutley ignoring it.

> As PEAR 1.4 _has_ to be compatible with 1.x, we did not ignore the
> changes. But we cannnot drop php4 support

> or maintain 2 code bases.

Then you don't suit php development and should get stripped out - end
of discussion - do what ever you want then!


>> Why can't at least the things that shall be shipped in 5.1 fashion -
>> especially since you're doing part of it in a way only 5.1 can serve
>> anyway.

> I do not get this sentence, can you elaborate?

You need to provide a 5+ version of core pear components so that we cn ship
those with 5.1.

Best regards,
 Marcus

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to