||*()*||    [\..konnichi wa, ogenki desu ka, Wez../]

>> Is there any developers who officially supports PHP 4 branch?

WF> Yes, we "support" people using it, but not so much people building it.
WF>  We're trying to shift people on to PHP 5 so that the support burden
WF> is lessened.  If you're building it yourself, you're competent enough
WF> to support yourself building it.

I might be compenent, but it was a waste of time. I'm not an OOP
programmer and I don't like PHP 5 yet. Thought I'm not alone. I
better not to deal with PHP 5 if you're going to support it like
that when PHP 6 is out.

Just wanted to help. I forgot about C long ago and do not have too
much experience to answer stupid questions myself. Sorry to bother
you.

Maybe you need to expand developers base somehow or make advanced
hot patch submission/review/approval/integration system on top of
chora, so less time will be wasted to review patch submissions.

>> > Don't forget that we have full-on win32 builds being generated
>> > courtesy of Edin, along with several snapshot builds throughout the
>> > day for all branches of PHP and PECL; there should be very little need
>> > for people to build their own, unless they are hacking on PHP
>> > itself--those people should be maintaining their own build
>> > environments.
>>
>> I think I've got the idea. Should. Bye.

WF> All I'm trying to say is that we have the things the way they are
WF> because its easier and less time consuming for most people using and
WF> developing PHP; don't let me discourage you.

Do as you wish.

WBR.techtonik
-- 
(B)uilding, (A)ntenna, (S)pan and (E)arth
* terminal velocity - 54m/s, 305m *

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to