On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > It's definitely not the most elegant way, I agree there. But there was > > also no sneaking as it was discussed months before, and it was actually > > Ilia who suggested doing it in PHP 5.1.0 and not 5.1.1. > > Then I have to ask both of you: why is there no mentioning in > the release notes or the upgrading guide regarding "Date" > being reserved for PHP now?
I thought it was actually, as I saw somebody quoting this. > It gets worde because there apparently has been _no_ > documentation of the fact at all. How shall our users > prepare themselves appropiately? This is why I petition to ammend the release notes ASAP. > I move that the class is renamed for the time being as to not > conflict with existing codebases, and release 5.1.1 > expediently. Yes, and that will break code again as I just explained to Sebastian Kettler. And it will break *my* code ;-) Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
