On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:49:04 -0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Nuno Lopes") wrote:> >I must say that I feel deceived by this. > > Derick and I agreed that this won't be enabled for 5.1, and he then > > took advantage of the fact that release managers changed to enable > > his class. Doesn't leave a good taste in my mouth and it shouldn't > > happen again in future. > > > > Andi > > Just to clarify, it was Ilia who enabled the class, but just to move > the constants there. All methods are still disabled. He did it on Derick's demand. Ilia's mistake was to trust him. As Andi did too. > >>As I stated before, core PHP does reserve the right to pick up the > >>most obvious keywords as we come up with new functionality, and I > >>think we should have a date class, but we should do it in an > >>orderly manner and give people some time to migrate to something > >>that actually makes sense. > >> > >>-Rasmus > > Right! And changing a class name from a PHP program takes just a few > seconds.. Wrong, you have to first test, change and retest. Some cannot be changed for obvious reasons, like pear::date, if you do not understand that, feel free to ask me why on irc, prv. --Pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
