Hello Jeff, what the hell do you want?
Friday, January 27, 2006, 8:23:26 PM, you wrote: > Hi, Marcus, > On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: >> yes, it is a conainer and not a set. > So why not call it a container instead of storage? >> And it cannot take anything other >> than php objects. That's why. > SplObjectContainer? > But, then, it has that uniqueness constraint. The SplObjectStorage > name doesn't convey that idea at all. > SplUniqueObjectContainer? > From an API standpoint (rather than an implementation standpoint), I > don't understand the need for the object only constraint in PHP. > SplUniqueZvalContainer? > SplUniqueValueContainer? > SplUniqueMemberContainer? > Yours, > Jeff Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
