> >>Yes, it would, given the root cause - but would you really want to break > >>the whole of PHP for an academic exercise? > > > > It's not really an academic exercise. If we know there's a bug someplace > > we should at least look into it and try and understand it. > > Frank's referring to Zeev's three-years-ago decision to simply opt out of > tsrm_shutdown() here... he's suggesting we revert it. > > > Then if we decide to remove the trsm_shutdown call for a good reason > > (circular dependency, blah blah blah) then we can do that and put a nice > > fat comment on why it's the right thing to do. But I do think it's > > benefical to try and understand what's happening. > > Fine, but breaking working code while you're trying to understand what's
> happening is far from beneficial to our users. Can't we at least #0 it? There is no need to break code. The shutdown function was commented out for a reason (crash) when that's fixed we can enable that code again. - Frank -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php