Hello Eric again, forget the last mail, you're right it is hasNext() in php, too. So it should be array_has_next() as well. Thanks to michael for reminding me. I got confused with the original implementation (i shouldn't have changed the name).
best regards marcus Sunday, June 4, 2006, 1:39:04 PM, you wrote: > Hello Eric, > our iterators have next() and valid() in separate functions. That alone > makes them way more powerful then java' iterators. In SPL we have an > iterator wrapper called CachingIterator that has a method has_more() > which has a boolean return value that allows to check whether a call to > next() leaves the iterator valid or not. So changing the name would only > add confusion. > best regards > marcus > Sunday, June 4, 2006, 1:17:55 PM, you wrote: >> Hi, >> Took from Java world, it could be something like array_has_next() which is >> more significant because return boolean is only about the next value not >> about all the next values. >> On 6/3/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Andi, >>> >>> Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 5:28:47 AM, you wrote: >>> >>> > Zeev and I designed each() to deprecate key()/current()/etc. which >>> > came from PHP/FI 2. Maybe not exactly what you're looking for but >>> > just want to point out that there have always been some issues with >>> > the latter functions. >>> > If each() isn't suitable (and/or you want something quicker) than I'm >>> > OK with an array_* function but I don't like array_valid(). It sounds >>> > too much like is_array() and implies the array is valid. Maybe >>> > something like array_valid_position()? >>> >>> Also good, i just chose the name becuase it's close to Iterator::valid(). >>> I am however more interested in the array_has_more() thingie. Often enough >>> one runs into a problem where the last entry of a list has a slightly >>> different behavior. >>> >>> > At 02:52 PM 5/27/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote: >>> >>Hello Matthew, >>> >> >>> >>Saturday, May 27, 2006, 11:36:16 PM, you wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Pierre wrote: >>> >> >> On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> >>> - bool array(array $array) >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !== >>> >> >>> NULL") >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I don't understand this one. >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> > I think you have to listen to psychedelic music and take a hit of >>> >> LSD first. >>> >> >>> >>Actually the point is that you cannot simply do stuff like >>> >>"while(key($array))". And "while(key($array) != 0)" doesn't work either. >>> >>Also "if (!key($array))" is probably different from what you expect. >>> >>And of course "isset(key($array))" doens't work either. >>> >> >>> >>Best regards, >>> >> Marcus >>> >> >>> >>-- >>> >>PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >>> >>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Marcus >>> >>> -- >>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>> >>> > Best regards, > Marcus Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
