On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, John Coggeshall wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 03:29 +0200, Steph Fox wrote:
> > Rasmus, I'm sorry but I can't agree with you. When we get namespacing it'll 
> > make perfect sense to have PHP::Foo(). Until then, it makes no sense 
> > whatsoever to me to mess about with plain names for root classes. We aren't 
> > breaking 'tousands of apps out there' unless someone doesn't bother to read 
> > the upgrade guide and happens to have not prefixed their own classes. And 
> > if 
> > in that situation, all the user needs to do is search and replace, and all 
> > _we_ need to do is offer support for that replacement that will work in PHP 
> > 4 as well as in PHP 5.2 and beyond.
> 
> I agree completely.

And so do I.

Derick

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to